<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 462 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of expenses disallowed by the Assessing Officer as they were incurred for business purposes and paid through legitimate channels. However, the disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on payments to a transporter was upheld due to the lack of proper clarification from the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2022 07:04:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 462 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of expenses disallowed by the Assessing Officer as they were incurred for business purposes and paid through legitimate channels. However, the disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on payments to a transporter was upheld due to the lack of proper clarification from the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>