<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 430 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that M/s. Mother Dairy and the DCMPUs are not related persons under Section 4(3)(b) of the Central Excise Act. The re-determined value and demand for differential duty were deemed unjustified. Previous judicial decisions and bylaws did not show mutual interest between the entities. The appeals were allowed, and the extended limitation period was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 430 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that M/s. Mother Dairy and the DCMPUs are not related persons under Section 4(3)(b) of the Central Excise Act. The re-determined value and demand for differential duty were deemed unjustified. Previous judicial decisions and bylaws did not show mutual interest between the entities. The appeals were allowed, and the extended limitation period was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>