https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427481 Statutory interest on an admitted refund could not be denied merely because the prescribed form was not filed, where the refund had attained finality and the governing rules supported the entitlement. The Madras HC rejected objections based on alleged suppression, address-change violations, pending matters, and delay, finding them unsupported or insufficient to defeat the interest claim. It upheld the assessee's right to interest on the refunded amount, set aside the rejection of the claim, and directed the department to quantify and pay the interest within the stipulated time. en-us Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Sep 2022 07:02:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427481 Statutory interest on an admitted refund could not be denied merely because the prescribed form was not filed, where the refund had attained finality and the governing rules supported the entitlement. The Madras HC rejected objections based on alleged suppression, address-change violations, pending matters, and delay, finding them unsupported or insufficient to defeat the interest claim. It upheld the assessee's right to interest on the refunded amount, set aside the rejection of the claim, and directed the department to quantify and pay the interest within the stipulated time. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427481