<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1963 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304154</link>
    <description>The court held that the right for consideration of compassionate appointment is not a vested right but a concession granted under specific circumstances to alleviate the deceased employee&#039;s family&#039;s distress. The policy prevailing at the time of application submission, not the time of the employee&#039;s death, should govern compassionate appointment decisions. The judgment emphasized that compassionate appointments are distinct from regular recruitment and depend on eligibility and financial conditions. The ruling aligns with previous decisions and highlights the employer&#039;s obligation to promptly address compassionate appointment applications in accordance with the prevailing policy at the time of application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2022 07:01:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1963 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304154</link>
      <description>The court held that the right for consideration of compassionate appointment is not a vested right but a concession granted under specific circumstances to alleviate the deceased employee&#039;s family&#039;s distress. The policy prevailing at the time of application submission, not the time of the employee&#039;s death, should govern compassionate appointment decisions. The judgment emphasized that compassionate appointments are distinct from regular recruitment and depend on eligibility and financial conditions. The ruling aligns with previous decisions and highlights the employer&#039;s obligation to promptly address compassionate appointment applications in accordance with the prevailing policy at the time of application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>