https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30371 Setting aside the order sustaining the demand also displaced the underlying demand, and the direction for fresh disposal of the assessee's appeal meant recovery could not proceed on the basis of the earlier demand. The absence of a separate stay order did not authorise recovery where the Tribunal's final order had already altered the status of the demand. The recovery letter therefore rested on an erroneous reading of the Tribunal's order, and the recovery proceedings were set aside. en-us Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30371 Setting aside the order sustaining the demand also displaced the underlying demand, and the direction for fresh disposal of the assessee's appeal meant recovery could not proceed on the basis of the earlier demand. The absence of a separate stay order did not authorise recovery where the Tribunal's final order had already altered the status of the demand. The recovery letter therefore rested on an erroneous reading of the Tribunal's order, and the recovery proceedings were set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30371