https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304156 The appellate court upheld the judgment of acquittal in a case challenging a decision under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in proving the sale and purchase of goods and debt owed. The accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption by casting doubt on the complainant's version through cross-examination and legal precedents. The judge highlighted the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused and dismissed the appeal, citing the lack of grounds for interference in the acquittal judgment. en-us Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Sep 2022 07:01:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304156 The appellate court upheld the judgment of acquittal in a case challenging a decision under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in proving the sale and purchase of goods and debt owed. The accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption by casting doubt on the complainant's version through cross-examination and legal precedents. The judge highlighted the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused and dismissed the appeal, citing the lack of grounds for interference in the acquittal judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304156