https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304132 The Court held that the Respondent was not entitled to compassionate appointment under the old scheme as the new scheme had replaced it. The judgment emphasized that eligibility for compassionate appointment is determined by the scheme in force at the time of consideration, not when the application was submitted. The Court allowed the appeal partially, directing the Respondent to apply under the new scheme for ex gratia payment as per the Bank's instructions, highlighting the employer's discretion to modify or abolish such schemes. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:26:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304132 The Court held that the Respondent was not entitled to compassionate appointment under the old scheme as the new scheme had replaced it. The judgment emphasized that eligibility for compassionate appointment is determined by the scheme in force at the time of consideration, not when the application was submitted. The Court allowed the appeal partially, directing the Respondent to apply under the new scheme for ex gratia payment as per the Bank's instructions, highlighting the employer's discretion to modify or abolish such schemes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304132