<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Finds Flaws in Polypropylene Anti-Dumping Duty Comparison; Pre-July 30, 2009, Stock Shouldn&#039;t Be Considered.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65554</link>
    <description>Levy of Anti Dumping Duty - the tribunal pointed that macro-comparison of the available stock of polypropylene from known ADD jurisdiction vis-à-vis DTA clearance during 2009-10 and 2010-11 by the adjudicating authority also suffers from infirmities and had agreed with the respondent that DTA clearance of finished goods prior to 30th July, 2009, the date of imposition of anti dumping duty could not have been considered and the stock of polypropylene as on the date of introduction of anti dumping duty could not have been ignored in such macro comparison. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 09:27:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 09:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Finds Flaws in Polypropylene Anti-Dumping Duty Comparison; Pre-July 30, 2009, Stock Shouldn&#039;t Be Considered.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65554</link>
      <description>Levy of Anti Dumping Duty - the tribunal pointed that macro-comparison of the available stock of polypropylene from known ADD jurisdiction vis-à-vis DTA clearance during 2009-10 and 2010-11 by the adjudicating authority also suffers from infirmities and had agreed with the respondent that DTA clearance of finished goods prior to 30th July, 2009, the date of imposition of anti dumping duty could not have been considered and the stock of polypropylene as on the date of introduction of anti dumping duty could not have been ignored in such macro comparison. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 09:27:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>