<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 419 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427474</link>
    <description>Suspension of GST registration was challenged on the ground that Rule 21A(2) did not afford a prior opportunity of hearing before suspension. The document notes that the petition questioned the show cause notice and the suspension recorded in it, and that interim protection was considered appropriate pending response from the authorities. Ad-interim stay of the effect and operation of the impugned notice and suspension was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 419 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427474</link>
      <description>Suspension of GST registration was challenged on the ground that Rule 21A(2) did not afford a prior opportunity of hearing before suspension. The document notes that the petition questioned the show cause notice and the suspension recorded in it, and that interim protection was considered appropriate pending response from the authorities. Ad-interim stay of the effect and operation of the impugned notice and suspension was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>