<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 302 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions to set aside the duty demand and dismiss the proceedings initiated by the Revenue. The Revenue&#039;s argument that duty paid goods underwent fresh manufacture upon return for refining was deemed unsubstantiated. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s new ground introduced before the Commissioner (Appeals), which failed to prove fresh manufacture. As a result, the impugned order was affirmed, and the appeal was rejected, with cross-objections disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 302 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions to set aside the duty demand and dismiss the proceedings initiated by the Revenue. The Revenue&#039;s argument that duty paid goods underwent fresh manufacture upon return for refining was deemed unsubstantiated. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s new ground introduced before the Commissioner (Appeals), which failed to prove fresh manufacture. As a result, the impugned order was affirmed, and the appeal was rejected, with cross-objections disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>