<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 402 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The share of loss from the partnership firm was not added back for computing book profit under Section 115JB. Additionally, the long-term capital loss from off-market transactions was allowed to be carried forward and set off in subsequent years. The decisions were based on a strict interpretation of provisions and precedents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 402 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The share of loss from the partnership firm was not added back for computing book profit under Section 115JB. Additionally, the long-term capital loss from off-market transactions was allowed to be carried forward and set off in subsequent years. The decisions were based on a strict interpretation of provisions and precedents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>