<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 401 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the rent and computer payments were reasonable and concessional, and the denial of exemption under section 11 was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of fair market value and proper benchmarks in assessing the reasonableness of transactions with specified persons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 401 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the rent and computer payments were reasonable and concessional, and the denial of exemption under section 11 was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of fair market value and proper benchmarks in assessing the reasonableness of transactions with specified persons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>