<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 380 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427435</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Lower Appellate Court&#039;s acquittal of the accused in a case involving the validity of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court reinstated the conviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court, finding that the Lower Appellate Court erred in disbelieving crucial evidence and failing to consider statutory presumptions. The accused were ordered to be secured and committed to prison to serve the sentence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 07:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 380 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427435</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Lower Appellate Court&#039;s acquittal of the accused in a case involving the validity of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court reinstated the conviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court, finding that the Lower Appellate Court erred in disbelieving crucial evidence and failing to consider statutory presumptions. The accused were ordered to be secured and committed to prison to serve the sentence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>