<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1453 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304122</link>
    <description>A liberal approach applies to condonation of delay where the delay is not substantial and there is no material showing deliberate default. Service of the decision and award on the petitioners was the relevant date for assessing delay, and the appeal filed soon after such service supported condonation. On those facts, the finding of lack of bona fides could not be sustained, and refusal to condone the delay was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 07:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1453 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304122</link>
      <description>A liberal approach applies to condonation of delay where the delay is not substantial and there is no material showing deliberate default. Service of the decision and award on the petitioners was the relevant date for assessing delay, and the appeal filed soon after such service supported condonation. On those facts, the finding of lack of bona fides could not be sustained, and refusal to condone the delay was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>