<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1452 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304121</link>
    <description>Service of a signed arbitral award is complete under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when it is sent to the party&#039;s correct recorded address and the addressee fails to collect it after postal intimation. The unclaimed envelope is treated as deemed service and refusal to accept delivery, so limitation for a challenge under Section 34(3) begins from that deemed date of service. The Court also held that time to obtain a certified copy cannot be excluded under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act because the Arbitration and Conciliation Act operates as a self-contained code on this point. The challenge was therefore barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 07:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1452 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304121</link>
      <description>Service of a signed arbitral award is complete under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when it is sent to the party&#039;s correct recorded address and the addressee fails to collect it after postal intimation. The unclaimed envelope is treated as deemed service and refusal to accept delivery, so limitation for a challenge under Section 34(3) begins from that deemed date of service. The Court also held that time to obtain a certified copy cannot be excluded under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act because the Arbitration and Conciliation Act operates as a self-contained code on this point. The challenge was therefore barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>