<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1557 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304119</link>
    <description>A suit for eviction filed before an area is declared a slum area remains maintainable under Section 22 of the Slum Act, because prior permission is required at the stage of execution of the decree, not for institution of the suit; the note states that the decree may be executed only after such permission is obtained. Service of notice under Section 12(2) of the Rent Act is treated as proved when the notice is sent by registered post and certificate of posting to the correct address, because statutory presumptions of service arise under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and Section 114 of the Evidence Act, and a bare denial of receipt does not rebut them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 07:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1557 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304119</link>
      <description>A suit for eviction filed before an area is declared a slum area remains maintainable under Section 22 of the Slum Act, because prior permission is required at the stage of execution of the decree, not for institution of the suit; the note states that the decree may be executed only after such permission is obtained. Service of notice under Section 12(2) of the Rent Act is treated as proved when the notice is sent by registered post and certificate of posting to the correct address, because statutory presumptions of service arise under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and Section 114 of the Evidence Act, and a bare denial of receipt does not rebut them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>