https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304125 Form DVAT 41 is described as requiring personal service on the Commissioner or the VAT authority deciding the objection, and the text notes that service on a successor authority without valid delegation may raise a substantive objection to notice validity. It also explains that a limited remand must be confined to the precise issues remitted earlier; if the authority instead conducts a de novo assessment or travels beyond the remand, the resulting order exceeds the permitted scope. The discussion therefore highlights two procedural controls in VAT adjudication: proper service of objection notices and strict adherence to the bounds of a remand. en-us Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 07:02:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304125 Form DVAT 41 is described as requiring personal service on the Commissioner or the VAT authority deciding the objection, and the text notes that service on a successor authority without valid delegation may raise a substantive objection to notice validity. It also explains that a limited remand must be confined to the precise issues remitted earlier; if the authority instead conducts a de novo assessment or travels beyond the remand, the resulting order exceeds the permitted scope. The discussion therefore highlights two procedural controls in VAT adjudication: proper service of objection notices and strict adherence to the bounds of a remand. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304125