<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427430</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under Sections 68 and 57 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as well as the unsecured loan from M/s Time Star Pvt. Ltd. The tribunal found the additional evidence and explanations provided by the assessee satisfactory in establishing the genuineness of the transactions, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 07:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427430</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under Sections 68 and 57 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as well as the unsecured loan from M/s Time Star Pvt. Ltd. The tribunal found the additional evidence and explanations provided by the assessee satisfactory in establishing the genuineness of the transactions, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>