https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304111 An appointment made in breach of the governing statutory recruitment rules is void and cannot create a legal right to hold the post. Completion of 240 days of service, vacancy, standing orders, estoppel, or waiver do not by themselves confer entitlement to regularization or reinstatement. Regularization is not equivalent to permanency and cannot override constitutional or statutory requirements for appointment. However, where the employee has worked for the requisite period, termination without compliance with mandatory industrial law requirements is illegal; in the stated facts, reinstatement was nevertheless refused and compensation substituted. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:21:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304111 An appointment made in breach of the governing statutory recruitment rules is void and cannot create a legal right to hold the post. Completion of 240 days of service, vacancy, standing orders, estoppel, or waiver do not by themselves confer entitlement to regularization or reinstatement. Regularization is not equivalent to permanency and cannot override constitutional or statutory requirements for appointment. However, where the employee has worked for the requisite period, termination without compliance with mandatory industrial law requirements is illegal; in the stated facts, reinstatement was nevertheless refused and compensation substituted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304111