<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 107 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30356</link>
    <description>Steel plates, rods, angles and similar fabricated items supplied for boiler-supporting work were treated as structures or parts of structures under Chapter Heading 7308, because they were prepared for use in erection work and were not identifiable as specific boiler parts. Classification turned on the tariff description and interpretative rules, not on the definition of boiler under the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. The mounting framework was regarded as a structural support rather than a component necessary for boiler functioning. The claim for classification under Chapter Heading 8402 failed, and the departmental classification under Heading 7308 was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 107 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30356</link>
      <description>Steel plates, rods, angles and similar fabricated items supplied for boiler-supporting work were treated as structures or parts of structures under Chapter Heading 7308, because they were prepared for use in erection work and were not identifiable as specific boiler parts. Classification turned on the tariff description and interpretative rules, not on the definition of boiler under the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. The mounting framework was regarded as a structural support rather than a component necessary for boiler functioning. The claim for classification under Chapter Heading 8402 failed, and the departmental classification under Heading 7308 was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>