<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (1) TMI 93 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304108</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the document in question was an acknowledgment of liability with an agreement to pay, not a promissory note. Consequently, the judgments of the trial court and the lower appellate court were overturned. The case was remanded to the lower appellate court for reconsideration based on the document&#039;s nature as an acknowledgment of liability with an agreement to pay. Costs were adjusted accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (1) TMI 93 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304108</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the document in question was an acknowledgment of liability with an agreement to pay, not a promissory note. Consequently, the judgments of the trial court and the lower appellate court were overturned. The case was remanded to the lower appellate court for reconsideration based on the document&#039;s nature as an acknowledgment of liability with an agreement to pay. Costs were adjusted accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>