<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 373 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427428</link>
    <description>SC ruled on GST payment dispute involving advertising services for Railways. The court directed Respondent to correctly pay GST to tax authorities within two weeks, ensuring the Petitioner receives input tax credit. The judgment sympathetically addressed the taxpayer&#039;s inadvertent payment error, emphasizing procedural correction without imposing additional financial penalties. The ruling focused on rectifying the payment mechanism under reverse charge principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 373 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427428</link>
      <description>SC ruled on GST payment dispute involving advertising services for Railways. The court directed Respondent to correctly pay GST to tax authorities within two weeks, ensuring the Petitioner receives input tax credit. The judgment sympathetically addressed the taxpayer&#039;s inadvertent payment error, emphasizing procedural correction without imposing additional financial penalties. The ruling focused on rectifying the payment mechanism under reverse charge principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>