https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427426 The Orissa HC dismissed a writ petition seeking GST reimbursement from government authorities for a works contract. The petitioner's claim was barred by limitation as the contract dated April 26, 2016 had an 11-month completion period, making any current claim time-barred. Following precedent in Chandra Sekhar Jena v. State of Odisha, the court held that determining GST liability falls within the domain of GST authorities, not writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The court declined to calculate GST components case-by-case, directing the petitioner to pursue other legal remedies. en-us Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Apr 2025 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427426 The Orissa HC dismissed a writ petition seeking GST reimbursement from government authorities for a works contract. The petitioner's claim was barred by limitation as the contract dated April 26, 2016 had an 11-month completion period, making any current claim time-barred. Following precedent in Chandra Sekhar Jena v. State of Odisha, the court held that determining GST liability falls within the domain of GST authorities, not writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The court declined to calculate GST components case-by-case, directing the petitioner to pursue other legal remedies. Case-Laws GST Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427426