<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 19 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the value of the chassis for determining the assessable value of the complete motor vehicle should be the assessable value of the chassis worked out by Eicher under Rule 8 of the Excise Valuation Rules, not its actual cost. The decision favored the Revenue against the assessee-appellant, directing the appeals to be listed before the Division Bench for final disposal according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 19 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the value of the chassis for determining the assessable value of the complete motor vehicle should be the assessable value of the chassis worked out by Eicher under Rule 8 of the Excise Valuation Rules, not its actual cost. The decision favored the Revenue against the assessee-appellant, directing the appeals to be listed before the Division Bench for final disposal according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>