<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 333 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427388</link>
    <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication. The disallowance of a depreciation allowance claimed by the assessee was overturned by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the &#039;block of assets&#039; concept, stating that depreciation is mandatory under section 32 of the Act, and directed the AO to allow the depreciation claim of Rs. 1,34,95,087/-. The appeal was allowed, and the AO was directed to allow the depreciation claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 333 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427388</link>
      <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication. The disallowance of a depreciation allowance claimed by the assessee was overturned by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the &#039;block of assets&#039; concept, stating that depreciation is mandatory under section 32 of the Act, and directed the AO to allow the depreciation claim of Rs. 1,34,95,087/-. The appeal was allowed, and the AO was directed to allow the depreciation claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>