<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 325 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Customs authority&#039;s decision on the classification of &#039;TV tuners,&#039; emphasizing that reliance on circulars could create uncertainty. It ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal underscored that circulars should not constrain appellate authorities&#039; discretion and relied on precedent to reach its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:22:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 325 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Customs authority&#039;s decision on the classification of &#039;TV tuners,&#039; emphasizing that reliance on circulars could create uncertainty. It ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal underscored that circulars should not constrain appellate authorities&#039; discretion and relied on precedent to reach its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>