<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 323 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both CP (IB) No. 373/KB/2018 and I.A. (IB) No. 1078/KB/2019. It held that a pre-existing dispute over the quality of goods supplied justified rejecting the Company Petition. The Tribunal found no merit in the allegations of perjury against the Operational Creditor and granted the Corporate Debtor liberty to pursue other legal remedies available under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 323 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both CP (IB) No. 373/KB/2018 and I.A. (IB) No. 1078/KB/2019. It held that a pre-existing dispute over the quality of goods supplied justified rejecting the Company Petition. The Tribunal found no merit in the allegations of perjury against the Operational Creditor and granted the Corporate Debtor liberty to pursue other legal remedies available under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>