<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 322 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427377</link>
    <description>The tribunal found the petition complete and admitted it for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. A moratorium was imposed, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed with specific compliance directions. The petition was allowed, and the parties along with the IRP were to be informed of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:22:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 322 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427377</link>
      <description>The tribunal found the petition complete and admitted it for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. A moratorium was imposed, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed with specific compliance directions. The petition was allowed, and the parties along with the IRP were to be informed of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>