<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 318 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427373</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Petition, quashing the impugned notices and the impugned order. It was held that the adjudication of the show cause notices after an inordinate delay was bad in law, violated principles of natural justice, and caused grave prejudice to the Petitioner. The court emphasized the need for revenue authorities to act diligently and expeditiously and to keep the answering party informed about the status of show cause notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:22:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 318 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427373</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Petition, quashing the impugned notices and the impugned order. It was held that the adjudication of the show cause notices after an inordinate delay was bad in law, violated principles of natural justice, and caused grave prejudice to the Petitioner. The court emphasized the need for revenue authorities to act diligently and expeditiously and to keep the answering party informed about the status of show cause notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>