<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1267 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304098</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was treated as dismissed for statistical purposes because it opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The dismissal was not a decision on the merits, and liberty was preserved for restoration if the dispute was not ultimately resolved under the scheme. The operative effect was that the appeal stood closed administratively pending the scheme&#039;s final outcome, rather than being finally adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:21:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1267 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304098</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was treated as dismissed for statistical purposes because it opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The dismissal was not a decision on the merits, and liberty was preserved for restoration if the dispute was not ultimately resolved under the scheme. The operative effect was that the appeal stood closed administratively pending the scheme&#039;s final outcome, rather than being finally adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>