<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 1050 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304093</link>
    <description>Surrender of tenancy under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 is effective only on strict compliance with the statutory procedure under Section 19; an alleged surrender not made in writing, not properly admitted, or not shown to be in good faith before the competent authority is invalid. The Court also held that once protected tenancy and the consequential ownership certificate under Section 38-E have attained finality, they cannot be reopened collaterally by challenging only the consequential step. A civil decree to which the appellants were not parties could not defeat their statutory rights, and a transfer made in breach of the Act could not confer valid title.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 1050 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304093</link>
      <description>Surrender of tenancy under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 is effective only on strict compliance with the statutory procedure under Section 19; an alleged surrender not made in writing, not properly admitted, or not shown to be in good faith before the competent authority is invalid. The Court also held that once protected tenancy and the consequential ownership certificate under Section 38-E have attained finality, they cannot be reopened collaterally by challenging only the consequential step. A civil decree to which the appellants were not parties could not defeat their statutory rights, and a transfer made in breach of the Act could not confer valid title.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>