<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cenvat Credit Denial Clarified: No Malpractice if Credit Not Taken; Rebate or Refund Claims Allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65501</link>
    <description>Denial of re-credit of Cenvat credit - if the appellant does not take any credit then no such mal-practice can happen and no credit can be accumulated. Moreover, it also implies that the credit “available” would mean the Cenvat credit taken and available in the credit of Cenvat account and not the credit that the appellant could have possibly taken but did not avail. - Benefit of rebate / refund claim allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 07:10:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 07:10:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cenvat Credit Denial Clarified: No Malpractice if Credit Not Taken; Rebate or Refund Claims Allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65501</link>
      <description>Denial of re-credit of Cenvat credit - if the appellant does not take any credit then no such mal-practice can happen and no credit can be accumulated. Moreover, it also implies that the credit “available” would mean the Cenvat credit taken and available in the credit of Cenvat account and not the credit that the appellant could have possibly taken but did not avail. - Benefit of rebate / refund claim allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 07:10:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>