<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 298 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted additional grounds raised by the assessee, following a Supreme Court decision. The assessee, engaged in real estate and leasing quarries, faced penalty proceedings under section 271AAA for concealing income. The Tribunal found that penalties were unjust as the undisclosed income was admitted, taxes paid, and criteria not met for penalty imposition. The penalties for both assessment years were deleted, with the appeal allowed on 30th August 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 06:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 298 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted additional grounds raised by the assessee, following a Supreme Court decision. The assessee, engaged in real estate and leasing quarries, faced penalty proceedings under section 271AAA for concealing income. The Tribunal found that penalties were unjust as the undisclosed income was admitted, taxes paid, and criteria not met for penalty imposition. The penalties for both assessment years were deleted, with the appeal allowed on 30th August 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>