<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 289 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427344</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the disallowance of wastage claimed in manufacturing gold ornaments for non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting that since there were no actual payments involved, TDS deduction was not applicable. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was overturned, and both appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 289 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427344</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the disallowance of wastage claimed in manufacturing gold ornaments for non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting that since there were no actual payments involved, TDS deduction was not applicable. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was overturned, and both appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>