<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 284 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the addition of Rs. 3,00,000. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition was unjustified as the cash deposits had a legitimate source from savings and opening cash in hand, emphasizing the importance of substantiated reasoning in tax assessments and rejecting arbitrary decisions based on assumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 284 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the addition of Rs. 3,00,000. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition was unjustified as the cash deposits had a legitimate source from savings and opening cash in hand, emphasizing the importance of substantiated reasoning in tax assessments and rejecting arbitrary decisions based on assumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>