<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 280 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427335</link>
    <description>Where entitlement to represent a deceased party depends on disputed succession rights founded on a will, trust deeds or an alleged transfer of assets, the substitution question cannot be conclusively decided in isolation from the pending testamentary dispute. A person directly affected by such an order is an aggrieved person and may challenge it. The Tribunal should await determination by the competent forum on the foundational testamentary issues and then pass a reasoned order on competing claims. The impugned substitution and dismissal orders were therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after the testamentary proceedings are decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 280 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427335</link>
      <description>Where entitlement to represent a deceased party depends on disputed succession rights founded on a will, trust deeds or an alleged transfer of assets, the substitution question cannot be conclusively decided in isolation from the pending testamentary dispute. A person directly affected by such an order is an aggrieved person and may challenge it. The Tribunal should await determination by the competent forum on the foundational testamentary issues and then pass a reasoned order on competing claims. The impugned substitution and dismissal orders were therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after the testamentary proceedings are decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>