<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 278 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427333</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Resolution Professional, directing the exclusion of specific periods from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) timeline to facilitate effective evaluation of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal timelines and the impact of unresolved disputes on the insolvency resolution process, ensuring a fair resolution process for stakeholders. The decision aligned with legal precedent, particularly the necessity to exclude time spent in legal proceedings from the CIRP period calculation, as highlighted in a Supreme Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 06:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 278 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427333</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Resolution Professional, directing the exclusion of specific periods from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) timeline to facilitate effective evaluation of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal timelines and the impact of unresolved disputes on the insolvency resolution process, ensuring a fair resolution process for stakeholders. The decision aligned with legal precedent, particularly the necessity to exclude time spent in legal proceedings from the CIRP period calculation, as highlighted in a Supreme Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>