<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 274 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427329</link>
    <description>Section 60(5)(b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not confer jurisdiction on the Adjudicating Authority to decide disputed recovery claims that require evidence and independent factual determination. Where sundry debtors contest liability, the liquidator cannot use summary insolvency proceedings to obtain a recovery determination that would bypass ordinary civil adjudication. Such claims must be pursued through the appropriate legal forum, and the NCLT&#039;s role remains confined to matters with a direct insolvency nexus. The application for recovery was therefore held not maintainable before the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 06:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 274 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427329</link>
      <description>Section 60(5)(b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not confer jurisdiction on the Adjudicating Authority to decide disputed recovery claims that require evidence and independent factual determination. Where sundry debtors contest liability, the liquidator cannot use summary insolvency proceedings to obtain a recovery determination that would bypass ordinary civil adjudication. Such claims must be pursued through the appropriate legal forum, and the NCLT&#039;s role remains confined to matters with a direct insolvency nexus. The application for recovery was therefore held not maintainable before the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>