<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1599 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304076</link>
    <description>Interim protection was granted against coercive recovery of service tax where the dispute concerned levy and recovery in light of the cited departmental circular. The HC issued notice on the writ petition and stay application, and directed that the respondents not proceed with coercive action against the petitioner for charging service tax as per the circular. The matter was made returnable within six weeks, preserving the petitioner&#039;s interim position pending further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 06:44:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1599 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304076</link>
      <description>Interim protection was granted against coercive recovery of service tax where the dispute concerned levy and recovery in light of the cited departmental circular. The HC issued notice on the writ petition and stay application, and directed that the respondents not proceed with coercive action against the petitioner for charging service tax as per the circular. The matter was made returnable within six weeks, preserving the petitioner&#039;s interim position pending further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>