https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304087 The HC granted an interim stay on payment of GST on minerals for which royalty had already been paid. The petitioner challenged a GST notice, arguing it constituted double taxation. The court recognized that similar issues were pending before the SC, where a Nine Judges Bench reference had been made and interim stays granted in comparable cases. Following judicial precedent and acknowledging the unresolved legal question regarding GST applicability to royalty-paid minerals, the HC stayed the GST demand until final determination by the SC. en-us Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304087 The HC granted an interim stay on payment of GST on minerals for which royalty had already been paid. The petitioner challenged a GST notice, arguing it constituted double taxation. The court recognized that similar issues were pending before the SC, where a Nine Judges Bench reference had been made and interim stays granted in comparable cases. Following judicial precedent and acknowledging the unresolved legal question regarding GST applicability to royalty-paid minerals, the HC stayed the GST demand until final determination by the SC. Case-Laws GST Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304087