https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304090 The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna, declined to entertain petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution, directing petitioners to seek remedies through Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitions were dismissed with liberty to pursue remedies as per the law. Pending applications were disposed of, and Special Leave Petitions were listed for final disposal on specific dates. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures and utilizing available legal mechanisms for efficient administration of justice. en-us Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jul 2023 18:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304090 The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna, declined to entertain petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution, directing petitioners to seek remedies through Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitions were dismissed with liberty to pursue remedies as per the law. Pending applications were disposed of, and Special Leave Petitions were listed for final disposal on specific dates. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures and utilizing available legal mechanisms for efficient administration of justice. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304090