https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427278 A fixed limitation period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was treated as mandatory, with only a limited 15-day discretionary extension after the initial 30 days. The Appellate Tribunal held that it had no power to condone a delay beyond that statutory outer limit, so a belated appeal filed after 1027 days was barred. The absence of an application for a certified copy within time did not assist the appellant, and COVID-19 limitation suspension orders did not revive a delay that had already expired before the relevant suspension period. The condonation application therefore failed. en-us Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2022 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427278 A fixed limitation period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was treated as mandatory, with only a limited 15-day discretionary extension after the initial 30 days. The Appellate Tribunal held that it had no power to condone a delay beyond that statutory outer limit, so a belated appeal filed after 1027 days was barred. The absence of an application for a certified copy within time did not assist the appellant, and COVID-19 limitation suspension orders did not revive a delay that had already expired before the relevant suspension period. The condonation application therefore failed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427278