<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 219 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that refiled appeals after curing defects should not be treated as fresh appeals but as refiling/representation. The limitation period for filing an appeal does not govern the period for curing defects in refiling, and delays can be condoned with sufficient justification. The appeals are to be listed for consideration of condonation of delay in refiling on 01st September, 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 20:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 219 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that refiled appeals after curing defects should not be treated as fresh appeals but as refiling/representation. The limitation period for filing an appeal does not govern the period for curing defects in refiling, and delays can be condoned with sufficient justification. The appeals are to be listed for consideration of condonation of delay in refiling on 01st September, 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>