<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 217 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for a refund of service tax paid on the construction of individual residential houses, determining that the houses did not fall under the taxable category of &quot;residential complex.&quot; The Tribunal also ruled that the principles of unjust enrichment did not apply as the appellant bore the tax burden. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and granted the appellant&#039;s refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 07:08:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 217 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for a refund of service tax paid on the construction of individual residential houses, determining that the houses did not fall under the taxable category of &quot;residential complex.&quot; The Tribunal also ruled that the principles of unjust enrichment did not apply as the appellant bore the tax burden. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and granted the appellant&#039;s refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>