<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 215 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427270</link>
    <description>Paper Cess levied under an enactment administered outside the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue was not includible in the base for Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess, so the cesses could not be computed on that amount. A refund paid under mistake was held not to be confined to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the facts stated, and the claim was not defeated by limitation or unjust enrichment because the incidence had not been passed on. Consequential refund relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 215 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427270</link>
      <description>Paper Cess levied under an enactment administered outside the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue was not includible in the base for Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess, so the cesses could not be computed on that amount. A refund paid under mistake was held not to be confined to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the facts stated, and the claim was not defeated by limitation or unjust enrichment because the incidence had not been passed on. Consequential refund relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>