<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1991 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304070</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing sufficient cause shown by the applicant. In analyzing an ITAT appeal, the Court found no question of law and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on factual reasoning. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Court refused to admit it, affirming the CIT-A&#039;s decision on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 07:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1991 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304070</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing sufficient cause shown by the applicant. In analyzing an ITAT appeal, the Court found no question of law and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on factual reasoning. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Court refused to admit it, affirming the CIT-A&#039;s decision on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>