<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 162 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30325</link>
    <description>The court remanded the case to the Central Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) for fresh consideration in light of the subsequent criminal court acquittal. This decision aimed to prevent conflicting findings from different tribunals, ensuring justice and fair play. The writ petition was disposed of, directing CEGAT to reconsider the appeal of the assessee afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 162 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30325</link>
      <description>The court remanded the case to the Central Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) for fresh consideration in light of the subsequent criminal court acquittal. This decision aimed to prevent conflicting findings from different tribunals, ensuring justice and fair play. The writ petition was disposed of, directing CEGAT to reconsider the appeal of the assessee afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>