<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Allegation of On-Money in Real Estate Case Found Flawed; Majority of Properties Sold at Contracted Rate.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65465</link>
    <description>On-money received in business of real estate development carried out - allegation that higher rate having been agreed to be paid, as compared to the contracted rate - The basis for holding that the assesseesse received on money clearly did not apply to maximum properties sold. The said facts and circumstances lead to the inescabable conclusion that the basis therefore was ill conceived. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:07:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:07:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Allegation of On-Money in Real Estate Case Found Flawed; Majority of Properties Sold at Contracted Rate.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65465</link>
      <description>On-money received in business of real estate development carried out - allegation that higher rate having been agreed to be paid, as compared to the contracted rate - The basis for holding that the assesseesse received on money clearly did not apply to maximum properties sold. The said facts and circumstances lead to the inescabable conclusion that the basis therefore was ill conceived. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:07:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>