https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304053 Delay in re-filing a Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not condoned unless the applicant shows prompt diligence and a satisfactory, bona fide explanation for the delay. Where the petition was filed without court fee, defects remained uncured for a substantial period, and the explanation for re-filing was unsatisfactory, the delay could not be justified. The strict approach to limitation in arbitration matters therefore led to refusal of condonation, and that refusal was affirmed. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Sep 2022 07:23:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304053 Delay in re-filing a Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not condoned unless the applicant shows prompt diligence and a satisfactory, bona fide explanation for the delay. Where the petition was filed without court fee, defects remained uncured for a substantial period, and the explanation for re-filing was unsatisfactory, the delay could not be justified. The strict approach to limitation in arbitration matters therefore led to refusal of condonation, and that refusal was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304053