https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304057 Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to the original filing of an application to set aside an arbitral award, not to re-filing after objections are returned for defects. The Court accepted that the delay in re-filing could be condoned on sufficient cause, particularly where extensions had already been granted and the explanation was acceptable in the circumstances. The Delhi High Court Rules did not operate to defeat the objections on the facts. The objections under Section 34 were directed to be taken on file and decided according to law. en-us Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Sep 2022 15:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304057 Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to the original filing of an application to set aside an arbitral award, not to re-filing after objections are returned for defects. The Court accepted that the delay in re-filing could be condoned on sufficient cause, particularly where extensions had already been granted and the explanation was acceptable in the circumstances. The Delhi High Court Rules did not operate to defeat the objections on the facts. The objections under Section 34 were directed to be taken on file and decided according to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304057